Category Archives: Teacher stuff…

It’s November and that means….

…the annual Maclean’s 2013 University Rankings are out! I started my undergrad at McGill in 1989 (sigh…I know…). I was under the impression that was the first year that Maclean’s began it’s yearly foray into post-secondary assessment. However, I stand corrected: according to the note from the editors, 1991 was the inaugural year.

It’s funny how alumnae allegiance works. Over the years, McGill has often stood, if not top of the heap, pretty darn close. Does it matter to me that McGill only ranks highly in the post-grad medical/doctoral categories? Me, whose undergrad time at McGill was spent in the Arts Building (primarily in Moyse Hall–the theatre)? Not a bit. I still take solace and pride in the fact that McGill has the reputation it has even if as an arts undergrad I would probably have been better served by a smaller comprehensive school.

Why? Because not only did I get to go to McGill, I got to experience Montreal…need I say more?

By the way, after you check out your school’s ranking there’s an interesting article on teaching and learning (including the use of technology) in the post-secondary environment: “Is big bad and small good?“.

Check it out…

1 Comment

Posted by on November 6, 2012 in 9751 stuff..., Random stuff..., Teacher stuff...


Thinking critically about the [LMS] box…? (9751 weekly response #7)

Well I just finished reading through Black’s two articles as well as a quick skim through the Copeland article.

My favourite quote: “[s]tudents are course-centric in their work and library resources need to be presented to them in that context in a convenient place” (Black & Blankenship, 2010, p. 466). Followed by a quote in Copeland: “Students are reluctant to leave their course environment even to access important information and their learning is contextual” (p. 203).

…because god-forbid students should have to show some initiative and find information by thinking critically about what they need. Sorry. That’s harsh, I shouldn’t be so…well…critical. But I seem to have read a fair bit over the last couple of years about university graduates–bright, academically successful grads–unable to problem solve or (to used that tired euphemism) “think outside the box”; that certain skills are lacking.

(Please allow me to soapbox a little, I’ll return to Learning Management Systems in a minute…)

Personally, I think a lot of this has to do with kids being asked to specialize and make decisions about their education too early. I know Ontario was the only province to have grade 13 (or OAC) but in getting rid of that extra year, students now have to plan their secondary path from the get-go. There’s no room to tryout a subject because of an honest-to-goodness interest. Or, what if a student loves drama but gosh-darnit there’s no place to put something so frivolous into her schedule in order to get all those maths and sciences she’ll need to apply to university–even if that’s the one thing that she truly loves? Whenever I talk to high school kids who are planning for university, I tell them that whatever they do, they can always change their mind. School will still be there. As someone who is in her third foray into post-secondary…life changes, interests change; I think it’s important to honour those interests when they’re present…And once again, a nod to an article in The Globe and Mail on the importance of a breadth of knowledge: “Why university students need a well-rounded education“.

Anyway, I think this idea of specialization creates a culture of “tell me what I need to do to get to X” as well as “tell me what I need to know”. I’m reminded of my first day teaching at a new school a few years ago. It was a private school, and as I introduced myself to my students, I asked them if there was anything they wanted to know…I kinda thought they might ask some personal type questions: I was even prepared for the age question. But no. These grade 5 (grade 5!) students proceeded to ask questions about grades: what they needed to get an A, how would I mark them on x-assignments, etc. I was shocked that they were so concerned about results.  And this on the first day of school. It starts early.

So I guess it’s no surprise that post-secondary students don’t want to explore library resources–especially going into the stacks. That they are happiest when all their resources are pulled together for them tidily in a LMS. So as librarians, are we contributing their inability to think critically about their information needs–supporting their habit, as it were? I guess if there was more information literacy trickle down into both secondary and elementary, then maybe by the time students were in post-secondary, they would be more able and confident to explore, as well as have a range of knowledge and skills from which to pull.

And perhaps I don’t have a good enough understanding of how a LMS works. I mean, I’ve never really had the opportunity to use one. I’ve only used OWL to post assignments and yes, to access some resources. But the whole integrated tool kit systems with the electronic reserves and other library resources, as well as information lit modules (as mentioned by Black)–well, I just haven’t had the opportunity to see one “it action” as it were with all the “resource pages with items and widgets” (Black & Blankenship, 2010, p. 464). Obviously, as a student I can see the appeal. I kinda think of it as an electronic filing cabinet containing all my course content and supports: is that a reasonable analogy? How great would that be? All my school stuff in one spot–online! I don’t need to go to the library let alone out of the house…well, maybe. I suppose I’d have class to attend. Or, maybe not.

So, I guess my criticism is not the LMS, but a greater pedagogical one…

Black, E. L. (2008). Toolkit approach to integrating library resources into the learning management system.
Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(6), 496-501.

Black, E. L. & Blankenship, B. (2010). Linking students to library resources through the learning management system. Journal of Library Administration, 50, 458-467. doi: 10.1080/01930826.2010.488587

Copeland, L. (2006). There be dragons; Learning management and library systems in Canada. IFLA Journal, 32(3), 200-208.

1 Comment

Posted by on October 16, 2012 in 9751 stuff..., Teacher stuff...


Apparently, reading is important…

A piece in the Harvard Business Review blog, points to the importance of reading:

For Those Who Want to Lead, Read“.

The post points out that reading is good for:

-improv[ing] intelligence and lead[s] to innovation and insight
-mak[ing] you smarter through “a larger vocabulary and more world knowledge in addition to the abstract reasoning skills.”
-is one of the quickest ways to acquire and assimilate new information.

Hmmm…is this one of those cases of “Everything I Ever Needed to Know I Learned in Kindergarten”?

Anyway, the article even encourages us to:
“Read for fun. Not all reading has to be developmental. Read to relax, escape, and put your mind at ease.”

Leave a comment

Posted by on September 18, 2012 in Teacher stuff...


“You have to be there” (…or do you?) [9751 musings; week #3]

OK, not that traditional…

Couple interesting articles on engaging students with traditional methods from The Globe and Mail…

for little people: Step away from the computer screen

and not-so-little: There’s no online substitute for the kind of engagement that goes on in a real classroom

Leave a comment

Posted by on September 17, 2012 in 9751 stuff..., Teacher stuff...